Newcomer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that doctor’s testimony on causation lacked competence because it was unsupported by the factual history of the incident
• concluding that doctor’s testimony on causation lacked competence because it was unsupported by the factual history of the incident
• concluding that an expert opinion cannot be solely based on inaccurate or false information
• stating that medical expert’s testimony which is based on a false medical history is incompetent as a matter of law
• holding testimony based on false medical history is incompetent
• expert medical opinion based on inaccurate medical record consisting of claimant’s personal opinion not substantial evidence of record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).