Morrison v. AMERICAN INTERN. INS.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[w]hen an insured purchases an original policy of insurance he may be expected to read it and the law may fairly impose upon him such restrictions, conditions and limitations as the average insured would ascertain from such reading”
• “[I]f the policy language is clear, the policy should be 8Defendants list the following similarities: 1
• \Lehrhoff . . . does not establish a bright[-]line rule that the declaration[s] page controls A-2328-17T3 16 where important additional terms of the policy are not included on the declaration[s] page but are reflected elsewhere.\
• considering a declaratory action brought by plaintiff to compel coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).