Sons of Thunder, Inc. v. Borden, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that in some circumstances the implied covenant will bar a contracting party from exercising its contractual rights
• holding that erroneous jury interrogatories may require reversal if “they were misleading, confusing, or ambiguous”
• holding that the jury could have reasonably found that a party breached its obligation to perform its duties in good faith given its conduct during termination
• holding that defendant breached the implied covenant when exercising unilateral right to terminate contract
• stating that judge’s charge and interrogatories to jury do not provide grounds for reversal unless misleading, confusing, or ambiguous
• explaining that “every contract in New Jersey contains an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).