Illinois Supreme Court· 11/16/2000

Morris B. Chapman & Associates, Ltd. v. Kitzman

Citations

739 N.E.2d 1263
193 Ill. 2d 560
251 Ill. Dec. 141
2000 Ill. LEXIS 1703
2000 WL 1709931

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

disagreeing with Seventh Circuit prediction that Illinois common fund doctrine applies only in class actions and insurance subrogation cases
using Restatement (Second) Conflict of Laws §§ 6 and 221 to determine which forum’s laws apply to claim sounding in unjust enrichment
absent statutory authority or a contractual agreement, each party must bear its own attorney fees and costs
The defendants argued (1) the common fund doctrine only applies to class action and subrogation cases; (2) there had to exist a segregated fund under court control, and (3
using Restatement (Second) Conflict of Laws §§ 6 and 221

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bilandic, Harrison, Rathje

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Other cases named Morris B. Chapman & Associates, Ltd. v. Kitzman

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.