Scholtens v. Schneider

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Congress' intent to preempt state law may be explicitly stated in the statute's language or implicitly contained in its structure and purpose\
• the common fund doctrine has been recognized and applied in the United States Supreme Court, the lower federal courts, and in the courts of virtually every state in the Union, including Illinois
• where the supreme court held that a quasi-contractual obligation to pay fees under common-fund doctrine arises wholly independently of, and is unrelated to, a contractual subrogation agreement between the parties
• where the supreme court held that a quasi-contractual obligation to pay fees under common-fund doctrine arises wholly independently of, and is unrelated to, a contractual subrogation agreement between the parties
• the common fund doctrine has been recognized and applied in the United States Supreme Court, the lower federal courts, and in the courts of virtually every state in the Union, including Illinois
• ERISA does not preempt application of common-fund doctrine to self-funded employee benefit plans

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).