Moritz v. Woods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Conduct-regulating rules are defined as those that ‘have the prophylactic effect of governing conduct to prevent injuries from occurring.’” (quoting Padula, 84 N.Y.2d at 522)
• denying a motion to dismiss on statute of limitations grounds where “there is no evidence before the Court regarding the dates”
• rejecting statute of limitations defense where “the [c]omplaint contains no information as to the date of the... tender or delivery”
• “Conduct-regulating rules are defined as those that ‘have the prophylactic effect of governing conduct to prevent injuries from occurring.”” (quoting 11 Padula, 84 N.Y.2d at 522)
• denying motion to dismiss on statute-of-limitations grounds where “the Complaint contain[ed] no information as to the [relevant dates]” and the dates were not otherwise referenced in properly considered documents
• “A federal district court sitting in diversity jurisdiction must apply the choice-of-law principles of the forum state, in this case New York.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).