S.D. New York· 5/28/1997
Moreno v. United States
Citations
- 965 F. Supp. 521
- 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7462
- 1997 WL 283386
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding contractor not Government agent where contractor “assumed full responsibility for ensuring that the Building was in compliance with applicable state and federal regulations.”
- denying the plaintiffs discovery request because, inter alia, the plaintiff failed to allege that the Government designed or constructed the defective condition, and no evidence on the record supported such an assertion
- imposing strict liability on the Government would amount to “disregarding the central inquiry mandated by the FTCA: whether any Government employee is guilty of a negligent act or omission” (cleaned up)
- “Because the FTCA creates a waiver of sovereign immunity, it is strictly construed and all ambiguities are resolved in favor of the United States.”
- “[I]t is well established that the United States’ decision to contract with independent companies to ensure maintenance of premises is a discretionary function, insulated from liability.” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kram
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Koulkina v. City of New YorkS.D. New York· 2008-02-19· cited 60×
- Whitney Holdings, Ltd. v. GivotovskyS.D. New York· 1997-12-24· cited 33×
- Lumpkins v. United StatesD. Maryland· 2002-02-21· cited 9×
- Kwitek v. United States Postal ServiceW.D. New York· 2010-02-18· cited 7×
- Zion v. United StatesW.D. Kentucky· 2012-12-21· cited 6×
- Clarke v. United StatesE.D. New York· 2015-06-03· cited 4×
- Glorioso v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationE.D. New York· 2012-06-21· cited 4×
- Suro v. United StatesE.D. New York· 2000-08-01· cited 3×
- Flanagan v. United StatesW.D. New York· 2006-04-20· cited 2×
- Yesina v. United StatesE.D. New York· 2012-12-27· cited 2×
- Lumpkins v. United StatesD. Maryland· 2002-08-07· cited 1×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court· 1941-03-31· cited 3,675×
- United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court· 1984-06-19· cited 1,618×
- United States v. OrleansSupreme Court· 1976-06-01· cited 979×
- Logue v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-06-11· cited 505×
- Mas v. Two Bridges AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals· 1990-05-03· cited 435×
- Williams v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1995-03-31· cited 410×
- Lipka v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1966-12-02· cited 55×
- B & a Marine Co., Inc. v. American Foreign Shipping Co., Inc. And Harry W. MarshallSecond Circuit· 1994-05-04· cited 52×
- Leone v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1990-07-30· cited 36×
- Bresnan Communications Co. v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court· 1994-10-31· cited 20×
- Berghoff v. United StatesS.D. New York· 1989-11-01· cited 11×
- Gallo v. United States, Department of TreasuryS.D. New York· 1997-01-03· cited 8×
- O'Neill v. United StatesE.D. New York· 1996-06-12· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.