Whitney Holdings, Ltd. v. Givotovsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that equitable estoppel was not appropriate where the grounds for invoking equitable estoppel were not separate and apart from the grounds for the substantive claim
• “The Legislature enacted Section 213(8) primarily in order to make clear that the discovery accrual provision adheres only to actual fraud claims.”
• “Section 213(7) supplants all other statutes of limitation potentially applicable to a suit on a corporation’s claim against its director, officer or shareholder.”
• “[S]uits alleging breach of fiduciary duty, particularly those seeking purely damages, have been construed as alleging ‘injuries to property’ and therefore held to come within CPLR § 214(4) which has a three year prescriptive period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).