Morehart v. Barton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• special action jurisdiction accepted because right asserted by victims not capable of protection if reviewed after trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lee
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-01-13· cited 11×
• Morehart v. Barton
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2011-04-29· cited 9×
• State of Arizona v. John David Franklin, Sr. & John David Franklin, Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-01-13

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Rompilla v. Beard
  Supreme Court· 2005-06-20· cited 1,891×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-10-15· cited 716×
• State v. Barnett
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1995-11-13· cited 98×
• State v. Michael Apelt
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1993-11-09· cited 79×
• State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-05-18· cited 78×
• Ex Parte Moody
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1996-09-27· cited 77×
• State v. Connor
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-07-17· cited 73×
• State Ex Rel. Pennartz v. Olcavage
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-08-30· cited 56×
• State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-09-26· cited 25×
• Romley v. Schneider
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-02-12· cited 14×
• State Ex Rel. Romley v. Dairman
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-08-10· cited 10×
• Zant v. Brantley
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1992-01-16· cited 5×