Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/5/1999
Moran Transportation Corp. v. Stroger
Citations
- 708 N.E.2d 508
- 303 Ill. App. 3d 459
- 236 Ill. Dec. 922
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In order to be granted an injunction, a plaintiff must have standing in the cause, which requires a showing of a clearly ascertainable right or interest that needs protection”
- exemption of railroads from diesel fuel tax survived uniformity challenge because there was a real and substantial difference between those taxed and those not taxed, and a reasonable relationship existed between the exemption and the object of the legislation
- exemption of railroads from diesel fuel tax survived uniformity challenge because there was a real and substantial difference between those taxed and those not taxed, and a reasonable relationship existed between the exemption and the object of the legislation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Quinn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dowd and Dowd, Ltd. v. GleasonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-09-13· cited 588×
- Preferred Personnel Services, Inc. v. Meltzer, Purtill & Stelle, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-01-23· cited 42×
- Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. BowerAppellate Court of Illinois· 2001-09-21· cited 17×
- People Ex Rel. Ryan v. McFallsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-04-27· cited 16×
- Guns Save Life, Inc. v. AliAppellate Court of Illinois· 2020-03-13· cited 6×
- Chicago Area Council of Boy Scouts of America v. City of Chicago Commission on Human RelationsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2001-05-01· cited 4×
- Exelon Corp. v. Illinois Dept. of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-09-24· cited 3×
- Exelon Corp. v. Illinois Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-09-24· cited 3×
- Chicago Area Council of Boy Scouts v. City of Chicago Comm'n on Human RelationsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2001-05-01
- Dowd & Dowd, Ltd. v. GleasonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-09-13
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Geja's Cafe v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-11-19· cited 144×
- Allegro Services, Ltd. v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-03-28· cited 137×
- People v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-04-16· cited 90×
- McKenzie v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1983-10-21· cited 66×
- Hough v. WeberAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-08-30· cited 33×
- Milwaukee Safeguard Insurance v. SelckeIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-10-23· cited 32×
- Jenner v. WissoreAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-01-05· cited 32×
- VILLAGE OF LAKE IN HILLS v. Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-05-05· cited 31×
- Illinois Municipal League v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-01-21· cited 25×
- Ball v. Village of StreamwoodAppellate Court of Illinois· 1996-03-27· cited 24×
- Matter of County CollectorAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-08-26· cited 22×
- Terry v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois· 1995-03-31· cited 19×
- Arca v. Colonial Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-06-30· cited 18×
- Kavanagh v. County of WillAppellate Court of Illinois· 1997-12-30· cited 15×
- Village of Schaumburg v. Jeep Eagle Sales Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-11-26· cited 13×
- P B M Stone, Inc. v. PalzerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-10-12· cited 11×
- Harris-Intertype Corp. v. Donley Bindery Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-02-07· cited 10×
- People v. KershnerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1997-09-09· cited 5×
- Matlow v. RosenfeldAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-05-21· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.