Morales v. Coca-Cola Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Parties are entitled to allege alternative inconsistent facts or theories in their pleadings.” (citing Booker v. Sarasota, Inc., 707 So. 2d 886, 888 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Morales
  M.D. Florida· 2014-07-16· cited 2×
• Christopher T. Knott v. Tracey L. Knott
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-09-06

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Goldman v. State Farm Fire Gen. Ins. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-08-16· cited 97×
• Kraemer v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-12-20· cited 59×
• Aurbach v. Gallina
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-03· cited 56×
• Booker v. Sarasota, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-06· cited 18×
• Medina v. Yoder Auto Sales, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-10-22· cited 9×
• Dockery v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-12· cited 5×
• Sterling v. Government Employees Insurance Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-22· cited 4×