Aurbach v. Gallina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that, while a party need not file a motion for new trial in seeking a remittitur or additur under section 768.74, Florida Statutes (1977
• stating that a trial court’s determination regarding ad-ditur may be reversed on appeal only where there is a clear abuse of discretion
• noting that trial court may not sit as seventh juror, substituting its findings with those of the jury
• on a consortium claim, where sufficient undisputed evidence was presented that would require an award of at least nominal damages, a zero verdict is inadequate as a matter of law
• on a consortium claim, where sufficient undisputed evidence was presented that would require an award of at least nominal damages, a zero verdict is inadequate as a matter of law
• “[A] trial judge may not sit as a seventh juror, thereby substituting his or her resolution of the factual issues for that of the jury.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).