Morad v. Coupounas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the question \whether or not an officer has misappropriated a corporate opportunity\ is \[n]ecessarily ... one of fact and the decisions of the trial court hearing the evidence ore tenus will not be disturbed on appeal unless plainly erroneous and manifestly unjust\
• stating that the question \whether or not an officer has misappropriated a corporate opportunity\ is \[n]ecessarily ... one of fact and the decisions of the trial court hearing the evidence ore tenus will not be disturbed on appeal unless plainly erroneous and manifestly unjust\
• commencement by three shareholders of a competing business in an area into which the existing corporation would have expanded, constituted a usurpation of a corporate opportunity that should have been made available to the existing corporation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).