Supreme Court of Alabama· 7/21/1978
Morad v. Coupounas
Citations
- 361 So. 2d 6
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the question \whether or not an officer has misappropriated a corporate opportunity\ is \[n]ecessarily ... one of fact and the decisions of the trial court hearing the evidence ore tenus will not be disturbed on appeal unless plainly erroneous and manifestly unjust\
- stating that the question \whether or not an officer has misappropriated a corporate opportunity\ is \[n]ecessarily ... one of fact and the decisions of the trial court hearing the evidence ore tenus will not be disturbed on appeal unless plainly erroneous and manifestly unjust\
- commencement by three shareholders of a competing business in an area into which the existing corporation would have expanded, constituted a usurpation of a corporate opportunity that should have been made available to the existing corporation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Faulkner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Coupounas v. MoradSupreme Court of Alabama· 1980-02-22· cited 33×
- Edwards v. Gramling Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-04-16· cited 28×
- Hensley v. PooleSupreme Court of Alabama· 2005-04-08· cited 27×
- Ellzey v. Fyr-Pruf, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court· 1979-10-31· cited 22×
- Grato v. GratoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-04-06· cited 12×
- Banks v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama· 1986-11-07· cited 10×
- Davis v. DorseyM.D. Alabama· 2007-07-06· cited 9×
- Bauman v. HayesSupreme Court of Alabama· 1980-01-25· cited 4×
- Mitchell v. K & B Fabricators, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2018-09-28· cited 1×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1939-04-11· cited 466×
- Irving Trust Co. v. DeutschSecond Circuit· 1934-09-17· cited 105×
- Lipscomb v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama· 1975-05-22· cited 58×
- Paulman v. KritzerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1966-09-01· cited 39×
- McKinstry v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama· 1953-04-30· cited 20×
- Tower Recreation, Inc. v. BeardIndiana Court of Appeals· 1967-11-27· cited 10×
- Smith v. ReeseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1966-07-05· cited 9×
- Cox and Perry, Inc. v. PerrySupreme Court of Alabama· 1976-06-18· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.