Lipscomb v. Tucker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the admissibility of the personal-knowledge testimony of a witness as to his mortgage-payment history in the face of an objection that the “best-evidence rule” required instead the introduction of applicable records
• upholding the admissibility of the personal-knowledge testimony of a witness as to his mortgage-payment history in the face of an objection that the \best-evidence rule\ required instead the introduction of applicable records
• mere delay is not sufficient for the defense of laches, but special facts which make the delay culpable must appear
• insufficient evidence of additional unsecured note to allow application of foreclosure proceeds to be applied to it first

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).