Mora v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that records subject to expunction under Maryland law do not include “investigatory files, police work-product records used solely for police investigation purposes, or records pertaining to certain motor vehicle or traffic offenses”
• \It is incumbent upon the appellant claiming error to produce a sufficient factual record for the appellate court to determine whether error was committed.\
• “It is incumbent upon the appellant claiming error to produce a sufficient factual record for the appellate court to determine whether error was committed.”
• ‘It is incumbent upon the appellant claiming error to produce a sufficient factual record for the appellate court to determine whether error was committed.’
• `It is incumbent upon the appellant claiming error to produce a sufficient factual record for the appellate court to determine whether error was committed.'
• “It is incumbent upon the appellant claiming error to produce a sufficient factual record for the appellate court to determine whether error was committed[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Denicolis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-10· cited 67×
• Gigeous v. Eastern Correctional Institution
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-04-10· cited 63×
• Nicolas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-08· cited 56×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-07-10· cited 27×
• Painter v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-05-05· cited 26×
• Black v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-03· cited 15×
• Fields v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-02-02· cited 11×
• Davis v. Magee
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-08-29· cited 10×
• Gigeous v. Eastern Correctional Institution
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-07· cited 6×
• Malaska v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-02-28· cited 6×
• Thornton v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-06-15· cited 4×
• Cottman v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-10-31· cited 4×
• Hosford v. Chateau Foghorn LP
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-09-01· cited 3×
• Joyner v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-11-29· cited 3×
• DiMeglio v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-29· cited 2×
• Frazier v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-02-03· cited 1×
• B.M. Sutton v. PSP
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-10-30
• Maryland Attorney General Opinion 110OAG82
  Maryland Attorney General Reports· 2025-10-06

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mora v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-11-25· cited 19×
• Truchan v. Nissan Motor Corp.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1998-12-15· cited 10×