Moore v. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the trial court failed to make the required express finding of a substantial change of circumstances” which is “not simply a formality”
• holding the trial court violated the mother’s due process rights by ordering weekly rotating custody when weekly rotating custody was not brought up in the pleadings, nor at trial
• holding the trial court violated the mother's due process rights by ordering weekly rotating custody when weekly rotating custody was not brought up in the pleadings, nor at trial
• the trial court erred in ordering rotating custody when neither party requested it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rossman v. Profera
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-07-27· cited 16×
• Bainbridge v. Pratt
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-04· cited 11×
• Anna Louise Krift v. Daryl Dean Obenour
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-11-05· cited 9×
• Waybright v. Johnson-Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-24· cited 1×
• Jane Doe v. James Uthmeier, Attorney General
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-05-14