· 7/27/2011
Rossman v. Profera
Citations
- 67 So. 3d 363
- 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11755
- 2011 WL 3110165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a trial court’s ruling on a motion to relocate is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
- noting testimony and closing argument indicating “that the mother was unwilling to return to Florida, no matter how the court ruled on her relocation request.”
- “Ultimately, the concern in a relocation determination is whether the relocation is in the best interests of the child.”
- “Ultimately, the concern in a 4 relocation determination is whether the relocation is in the best interests of the child.”
- “Courts, including this court, have held that relocation alone does not constitute a substantial change in circumstances.” (collecting cases)
- “Ultimately, the concern in a relocation determination is whether the relocation is in the best interests of the child.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ciklin, Gross, Hazouri
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.