Skip to main content
· 7/27/2011

Rossman v. Profera

Citations

  • 67 So. 3d 363
  • 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11755
  • 2011 WL 3110165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a trial court’s ruling on a motion to relocate is reviewed for an abuse of discretion
  • noting testimony and closing argument indicating “that the mother was unwilling to return to Florida, no matter how the court ruled on her relocation request.”
  • “Ultimately, the concern in a relocation determination is whether the relocation is in the best interests of the child.”
  • “Ultimately, the concern in a 4 relocation determination is whether the relocation is in the best interests of the child.”
  • “Courts, including this court, have held that relocation alone does not constitute a substantial change in circumstances.” (collecting cases)
  • “Ultimately, the concern in a relocation determination is whether the relocation is in the best interests of the child.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ciklin, Gross, Hazouri

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.