Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1/17/1990
Moore v. State
Citations
- 788 P.2d 387
- 1990 OK CR 5
- 1990 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 5
- 1990 WL 3858
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that expert testimony that hair comparison results meant defendant was in victim's house was properly admitted under section 2702
- concluding that expert testimony that hair comparison results meant defendant was in victim's house was properly admitted under section 2702
- concluding that whether expert properly performed hair comparison test goes to weight of evidence and is thus a jury question
- concluding that whether expert properly performed hair comparison test goes to weight of evidence and is thus a jury question
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parks, Brett, Lane, Lumpkin, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Romano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1993-01-13· cited 200×
- Mayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-08-04· cited 194×
- Cargle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-12-22· cited 189×
- Moore v. GibsonTenth Circuit· 1999-09-28· cited 175×
- Deboue v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1990-10-01· cited 160×
- Romano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-12-19· cited 159×
- Woodruff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1993-01-13· cited 146×
- Williamson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1991-05-15· cited 134×
- Bryson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-05-20· cited 125×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-01-31· cited 124×
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1992-10-01· cited 120×
- Battenfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1991-07-18· cited 118×
- Hooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1993-10-05· cited 118×
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-03-08· cited 105×
- Duckett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-10-17· cited 100×
- Revilla v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-04-22· cited 99×
- Smallwood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-10-13· cited 90×
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1994-07-29· cited 86×
- Robedeaux v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1993-12-20· cited 85×
- Perry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-04-07· cited 81×
Cites
83 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 4,171×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 2,653×
- Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,349×
- Estes v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 1,725×
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 1,651×
- Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1975-06-16· cited 1,568×
- Patton v. YountSupreme Court· 1984-06-26· cited 1,463×
- Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court· 1988-06-06· cited 1,367×
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1976-06-29· cited 1,306×
- Rideau v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1963-06-03· cited 1,211×
- Spuehler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1985-12-02· cited 534×
- Walker v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1986-12-01· cited 387×
- Sumner v. ShumanSupreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 263×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.