Moore v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding evidence sufficient to prove party established dominion over disputed land by “paying taxes on it, maintaining an access road over it, having it timbered, planting it, and later, disputing the activities of [another] in treating the land as his own”
• “[W]hen a consentable line is established, the land behind such a line becomes the property of each neighbor regardless of what the deed specifies. In essence, each neighbor gains marketable title to that land behind the line, some of which may not have been theirs under their deeds.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Viall, W. v. Garvin, H.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-06-10· cited 6×
• Mt. Bethany Gun Club v. King
  Centre County Court of Common Pleas· 2009-12-14
• Cherry Timber Associates, Inc. v. Mitchell
  Clearfield County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-02-10

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Soderberg v. Weisel
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-01-07· cited 62×
• Zeglin v. Gahagen
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-19· cited 25×
• Schimp v. Allaman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-05· cited 24×
• Corbin v. Cowan
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-07-14· cited 18×
• Dawson v. Coulter
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1919-01-04· cited 13×