Moore v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• urging that “trial courts expressly state their reservation of jurisdiction ... without resort to ‘nominal’ alimony awards” where record shows that spouse may require support “in the near or foreseeable future”
• urging that \trial courts expressly state their reservation of jurisdiction ... without resort to `nominal' alimony awards\ where record shows that spouse may require support \in the near or foreseeable future\
• finding \no reason why the trial court should not be empowered to reserve jurisdiction indefinitely... to make an alimony award\ where the asking party fails to demonstrate \any present need for support\
• finding “no reason why the trial court should not be empowered to reserve jurisdiction indefinitely ... to make an alimony award” where the asking party fails to demonstrate “any present need for support”
• proper for trial court to retain jurisdiction to award alimony to husband in future
• to overcome presumption that gift was intended by joint title, person challenging effect of deed must come forward with sufficient evidence or testimony to the contrary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McNally v. McNally
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1987-12-09· cited 73×
• Kennedy v. Kennedy
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-07-23· cited 43×
• Blanchard v. Blanchard
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-09· cited 25×
• Young v. Young
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-29· cited 23×
• McClay v. McClay
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-04-04· cited 13×
• Gergen v. Gergen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-22· cited 6×
• Mullins v. Mullins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-01-27· cited 5×
• O'Neal v. O'Neal
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-12-23· cited 3×
• Brancolino v. Carretta
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-02-13· cited 3×
• Williams v. Williams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-11-18· cited 3×
• Gosline v. Gosline
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-08-04· cited 2×
• Wachter v. Lezdey (In Re Lezdey)
  M.D. Florida· 2007-06-08· cited 1×
• Savino v. Savino
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-24· cited 1×
• Christmas v. Christmas
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-09-29· cited 1×
• Thomas v. Thomas
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-11-23· cited 1×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• Shaw v. Shaw
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1976-05-12· cited 487×
• Ball v. Ball
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1976-06-30· cited 157×
• Cann v. Cann
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-06-30· cited 61×
• Lee v. Lee
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-03-05· cited 54×
• Kirchman v. Kirchman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-10-22· cited 31×
• Wright v. Wright
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-10-08· cited 11×
• George v. George
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-06-27· cited 9×
• Marsh v. Marsh
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-03· cited 6×
• Munger v. Munger
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-04-30· cited 5×
• Chayka v. Chayka
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-07-12· cited 4×
• Maryea v. Maryea
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-10-29· cited 4×
• Lindquist v. Lindquist
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-11-04· cited 3×
• Atkins v. Atkins
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-02-06· cited 2×
• Ferguson v. Ferguson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-01-26· cited 2×