Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 9/2/1994

Moore v. McDonald

Citations

  • 30 F.3d 616
  • 1994 WL 442413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, where the plaintiff claimed that an officer unreasonably searched his car and confiscated his knife, that the claims accrued the day of search
  • ―In particular cases, one or two of the factors may outweigh the others, either rendering the broadcast material patently offensive and consequently indecent, or, alternatively, removing the broadcast material from the realm of indecency.‖ (footnotes omitted)
  • ―In particular cases, one or two of the factors may outweigh the others, either rendering the broadcast material patently offensive and consequently indecent, or, alternatively, removing the broadcast material from the realm of indecency.‖ (footnotes omitted)
  • “Moore certainly possessed the ‘critical facts’ concerning the allegedly unreasonable search of the car on the day it occurred[,] . . . when he became ‘aware that he ha[d] suffered an injury or ha[d] sufficient information to know that he ha[d] been injured.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jolly, Wiener, Garza

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Moore v. McDonald

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.