Fifth Circuit· 1/28/2003
Keko v. Hingle
Citations
- 318 F.3d 639
- 2003 WL 61241
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The denial of an immunity defense may be subject to interlocutory appeal.”
- “The denial of an immunity defense may be subject to interlocutory appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Higginbotham, Jones, Barksdale
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gregory v. City of LouisvilleSixth Circuit· 2006-04-11· cited 649×
- Brown v. MillerFifth Circuit· 2008-02-27· cited 138×
- Randy Cole v. Michael HunterFifth Circuit· 2015-09-25· cited 78×
- Wilson v. BernetWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2005-11-18· cited 18×
- Jones v. HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEMS.D. Texas· 2011-09-30· cited 7×
- Lacy v. County of MaricopaD. Arizona· 2008-12-24· cited 3×
- Collis v. United StatesD. Maryland· 2007-07-19· cited 2×
- Keko v. HingleFifth Circuit· 2003-01-08
- Gregory v. City of LouisvilleSixth Circuit· 2006-05-04
- Aisenberg v. Hillsborough County Sheriff's OfficeM.D. Florida· 2004-07-16
- Randy Cole v. Michael HunterFifth Circuit· 2015-09-29
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court· 1986-03-05· cited 6,748×
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court· 1995-06-12· cited 2,857×
- Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 2,450×
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court· 1983-03-07· cited 2,053×
- Dennis v. SparksSupreme Court· 1980-11-17· cited 1,661×
- Kalina v. FletcherSupreme Court· 1997-12-10· cited 1,173×
- Moore v. McDonaldFifth Circuit· 1994-09-02· cited 397×
- Jones v. CannonEleventh Circuit· 1999-05-11· cited 358×
- Cantu v. RochaFifth Circuit· 1996-02-28· cited 165×
- Kerr v. LyfordFifth Circuit· 1999-04-14· cited 139×
- Khalil v. University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey-New Jersey Medical SchoolSupreme Court· 1988-10-03· cited 109×
- Martha S. Strength v. W.L. Hubert, Charles Carroll, Individually, William L. Strength, Jr. v. W.L. Hubert, Charles Carroll, IndividuallyEleventh Circuit· 1988-10-06· cited 101×
- Harold Wayne Enlow v. Tishomingo County, Mississippi, Jim Wall, in His Individual CapacityFifth Circuit· 1992-08-06· cited 82×
- Stephen Buckley, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. J. Michael Fitzsimmons, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesSeventh Circuit· 1991-01-14· cited 78×
- D.C. Wheeler and John Thedford Sims v. Cosden Oil and Chemical Co.Fifth Circuit· 1984-10-25· cited 75×
- Chauncey Marvin Holt v. Richard Modesto CastanedaNinth Circuit· 1987-11-06· cited 62×
- James J. Cervantes v. Larry JonesSeventh Circuit· 1999-08-13· cited 58×
- Darrell D. Kincaid v. Daniel Eberle, Individually and in His Capacity as an Agent or Employee of the Lafayette, Indiana Police DepartmentSeventh Circuit· 1983-08-08· cited 55×
- Williams v. HeptingThird Circuit· 1988-05-24· cited 48×
- Castellano v. FragozoFifth Circuit· 2002-11-20· cited 25×
Other cases named Keko v. Hingle
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.