Skip to main content
Veterans Claims· 11/14/1990

Moore v. Derwinski

Citations

  • 1 Vet. App. 83
  • 1990 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 25
  • 1990 WL 303143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the Court had jurisdiction over a motion for extraordinary relief independent of a pending appeal
  • \confirm[ing] the authority of appellate courts to entertain requests for injunctive relief under the All Writs Act\
  • interpreting requirements for injunctive relief under Rule 8 of the Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure as (1) invasion of a legal right, (2) irreparable harm, and (3) ripeness
  • interpreting requirements for injunctive relief under Rule 8 of the Court’s Rules of Practice and Procedure as (1) invasion of a legal right, (2) irreparable harm, and (3) ripeness
  • seeking to enjoin VA from requiring the appellant to submit to a physical examination
  • seeking to enjoin VA from requiring the appellant to submit to a physical examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ivers, Mankin, Steinberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.