Moore v. Central Maine Power Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the final judgment rule is meant to prevent an appeal from being entertained “while there is still a live controversy before the court” and that the rule “must be tempered with reason and applied with discretion”
• stating that the final judgment rule is meant to prevent an appeal from being entertained “while there is still a live controversy before the court” and that the rule “must be tempered with reason and applied with discretion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Adoption of Matthew R.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2000-05-16· cited 7×
• Blue Sky West, LLC v. Maine Revenue Services
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2019-08-20· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Patrons Oxford Mutual Insurance v. Marois
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1990-04-02· cited 77×
• In Re Erica B.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1987-01-22· cited 29×