Skip to main content
· 4/2/1990

Patrons Oxford Mutual Insurance v. Marois

Citations

  • 573 A.2d 16
  • 1990 Me. LEXIS 97

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that state DEP's administrative proceeding to compel clean-up of pollution was not \suit against the insured seeking damages\ within meaning of multiperil policy requiring insurer to defend insured in any suit seeking damages
  • holding that state DEP’s administrative proceeding to compel clean-up of pollution was not “suit against the insured seeking damages” within meaning of multiperil policy requiring insurer to defend insured in any suit seeking damages
  • stating expenditures that one is not legally obligated to make are not “damages,” even though they may be “substantial and may effectively alleviate or prevent property damage to others”
  • finding no duty to defend an administrative proceeding brought by the Department of Environmental Protection to compel clean-up because the agency action was not a suit seeking damages
  • finding no duty to defend administrative proceedings under Maine’s environmental cleanup statute
  • an administrative order compelling cleanup by responsible parties was not a suit seeking damages under Maine law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wathen, Glassman, Clifford, Hornby, Collins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.