· 4/2/1990
Patrons Oxford Mutual Insurance v. Marois
Citations
- 573 A.2d 16
- 1990 Me. LEXIS 97
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that state DEP's administrative proceeding to compel clean-up of pollution was not \suit against the insured seeking damages\ within meaning of multiperil policy requiring insurer to defend insured in any suit seeking damages
- holding that state DEP’s administrative proceeding to compel clean-up of pollution was not “suit against the insured seeking damages” within meaning of multiperil policy requiring insurer to defend insured in any suit seeking damages
- stating expenditures that one is not legally obligated to make are not “damages,” even though they may be “substantial and may effectively alleviate or prevent property damage to others”
- finding no duty to defend an administrative proceeding brought by the Department of Environmental Protection to compel clean-up because the agency action was not a suit seeking damages
- finding no duty to defend administrative proceedings under Maine’s environmental cleanup statute
- an administrative order compelling cleanup by responsible parties was not a suit seeking damages under Maine law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wathen, Glassman, Clifford, Hornby, Collins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.