Supreme Court of Kansas· 7/28/2006

Montoy v. State

Citations

282 Kan. 9
138 P.3d 755
2006 Kan. LEXIS 479

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“In Montoy II, we rejected the plaintiffs’ claim that the school finance act violated the Equal Protection Clause of the United States and Kansas Constitutions.”
supplemental general state aid is designed to equalize the ability of districts with lower property wealth to raise money through the use of the LOB
“Equity does not require the legislature to provide equal funding for each student or school district.”
at best, inadequacy was cured three years later when this court found substantial compliance for interim purposes
“The legislature ... responded to our concerns about the equitable distribution of funding.”
“Equity does not require the legislature to provide equal funding for each student or school district. ... What is required is an equitable and fair distribution of the funding to provide an opportunity for every student to obtain a suitable education.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Luckert, Nuss, Rosen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.