Montgomery, Jeri Dawn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that reviewing court must not usurp jury’s role by “substituting its own judgment for that of the jury”
• providing that a reviewing court must not usurp the jury’s role by “substituting its own judgment for that of the jury”
• stating that reviewing court 5 must not usurp jury’s role by “substituting its own judgment for that of the jury”
• stating that reviewing court must not usurp jury’s role by “substituting its own judgment for that of the jury”
• stating that reviewing court must not usurp jury’s role by “substituting its own judgment for that of the jury”
• reviewing court must not usurp the jury's role by \substituting its own judgment for that of the jury\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).