District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/6/2001
Monday v. State
Citations
- 792 So. 2d 1278
- 2001 WL 1013594
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- victim-witness’s prior consistent statement was admissible for rehabilitation, because it could be useful to jury for credibility finding
- victim-witness’s prior consistent statement was admissible for rehabilitation, because it could be useful to jury for credibility finding
- a prior consistent statement used to rehabilitate a witness who has been impeached may be admissible even in situations where the witness does not claim an exception to the hearsay rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Padovano
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MadiganSupreme Court of Vermont· 2015-04-17· cited 17×
- Fleitas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-31· cited 14×
- Billy Joe Pitts v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-08-10· cited 8×
- J.B.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-06-09· cited 4×
- Shiba v. GabayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-08-07· cited 2×
- JBJ v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-06-09
- GARY TIMOTHY KITCHINGS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-02-12
- Goldtrap v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-23
- Campos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-05
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. EppensSupreme Court of Colorado· 1999-04-26· cited 556×
- People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-10-17· cited 286×
- United States v. EllisFourth Circuit· 1997-08-06· cited 259×
- United States v. William RubinSecond Circuit· 1979-09-06· cited 138×
- United States v. Yvonne Harris and Josephine HarrisSeventh Circuit· 1985-05-02· cited 116×
- United States v. Harry P. Casoni, A/K/A Pete CasoniThird Circuit· 1992-01-09· cited 111×
- State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-25· cited 108×
- Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-10-08· cited 89×
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-01-10· cited 87×
- United States v. Joseph Maria Andrade, United States of America v. Benjamin Calvin RileyEighth Circuit· 1986-04-14· cited 78×
- Commonwealth v. ZukoskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1976-04-02· cited 77×
- United States v. Michel PierreSecond Circuit· 1986-01-17· cited 70×
- State v. McCarthySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1979-09-04· cited 51×
- United States v. Manuel Castillo and Juan FernandezSecond Circuit· 1994-01-28· cited 49×
- Van Gallon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1951-02-23· cited 40×
- Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-12-28· cited 32×
- McElveen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-05-18· cited 27×
- State v. PalabayHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1992-12-17· cited 25×
- Jenkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-16· cited 23×
- State v. FultonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-11-23· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.