Skip to main content

Monday v. State

Citations

  • 792 So. 2d 1278
  • 2001 WL 1013594

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • victim-witness’s prior consistent statement was admissible for rehabilitation, because it could be useful to jury for credibility finding
  • victim-witness’s prior consistent statement was admissible for rehabilitation, because it could be useful to jury for credibility finding
  • a prior consistent statement used to rehabilitate a witness who has been impeached may be admissible even in situations where the witness does not claim an exception to the hearsay rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Padovano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.