Ninth Circuit· 12/15/2015
Mondaca-Vega v. Holder
Citations
- 808 F.3d 413
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 21907
- 2015 WL 8755585
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “clear and convincing” and “clear, unequivocal, and convincing” are equivalent standards and that they apply to alienage determinations
- noting that “the clear error standard ‘does not vest[] us with power to reweigh the evidence presented at trial in an attempt to assess which items should and which should not have been accorded credibility’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas, Pregerson, Kozinski, Silverman, Fletcher, Rawlinson, Bybee, Smith, Murguia, Nguyen, Hurwitz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ricky Earp v. Ron DavisNinth Circuit· 2018-02-06· cited 36×
- United States v. David LonichNinth Circuit· 2022-01-10· cited 24×
- Smith v. GarlandNinth Circuit· 2024-06-03· cited 14×
- Mark Brown v. Eric Holder, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2016-08-02· cited 10×
- Wallen Lawson v. Ppg Arch. Finishes, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2020-12-07· cited 6×
- Victor Meza-Carmona v. Merrick GarlandNinth Circuit· 2024-08-26· cited 4×
- Tapia-Felix v. LynchD. Arizona· 2017-03-10· cited 1×
- Alexander v. SessionsD. Arizona· 2017-04-11· cited 1×
- Mercado-MartinezBoard of Immigration Appeals· 2026-03-26· cited 1×
- Jackson v. Attorney General United States of AmericaDistrict of Columbia· 2020-04-20
- Demirchyan v. LynchNinth Circuit· 2017-10-03
- Rosa v. BondiFirst Circuit· 2025-03-13
- Rosa v. BondiFirst Circuit· 2025-07-11
- Roberto Moncada v. Marco A. RubioNinth Circuit· 2025-08-20
- State of Oregon v. TrumpNinth Circuit· 2025-10-20
Cites
70 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 11,658×
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 9,383×
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 4,912×
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-04-30· cited 3,004×
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-11-01· cited 2,703×
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 2,564×
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court· 1982-04-27· cited 2,420×
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court· 1958-03-31· cited 2,182×
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-04-30· cited 2,137×
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 2,022×
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court· 1985-12-03· cited 1,743×
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-03-01· cited 1,664×
- Miller v. GammieNinth Circuit· 2003-07-09· cited 1,582×
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-17· cited 1,277×
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1951-06-04· cited 1,230×
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-01-17· cited 1,144×
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court· 1955-04-04· cited 1,032×
Other cases named Mondaca-Vega v. Holder
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.