Eighth Circuit· 8/25/2010

Molina Jerez v. Holder

Citations

625 F.3d 1058
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 17751
2010 WL 3325469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that whether an alien “registered for ABC benefits in a timely manner is a purely factual issue over which this court lacks jurisdiction”
“In their briefs, the parties freely refer to the district court proceedings, of which we may take judicial notice for the sake of completeness.”
“We agree with the district court’s statement that jurisdiction to review the propriety of the Reinstatement Order rests with the court of appeals.”
“We agree with the district court’s statement that jurisdiction to review the propriety of the Reinstatement Order rests with the court of appeals.”
indicating such a course of action raises no retroactivity concerns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Wollman, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.