Molina Jerez v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that whether an alien “registered for ABC benefits in a timely manner is a purely factual issue over which this court lacks jurisdiction”
• “In their briefs, the parties freely refer to the district court proceedings, of which we may take judicial notice for the sake of completeness.”
• “We agree with the district court’s statement that jurisdiction to review the propriety of the Reinstatement Order rests with the court of appeals.”
• “We agree with the district court’s statement that jurisdiction to review the propriety of the Reinstatement Order rests with the court of appeals.”
• indicating such a course of action raises no retroactivity concerns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).