St. Louis Effort For AIDS v. John Huff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that this “narrow” preemption clause only implicates “state laws that ‘hinder or impede’ the [ACA’s] implementation”
• finding that several of the Missouri state laws challenged in the case were likely preempted since the laws interfered with federal law by preventing certain federal officials from performing their required duties
• defining refer as “to send [or] direct for treatment, aid, information, or decision” (alteration in original) (citing Web- ster’s Third New International Dictionary 1907 (1993))
• defining refer as “to send [or] direct for treatment, aid, information, or decision” (alteration in original) (citing Web- ster’s Third New International Dictionary 1907 (1993))
• stating “a preliminary injunction must be narrowly tailored . . . to remedy only the specific harms shown by the plaintiffs, rather than to enjoin all possible breaches of the law”
• “[A] preliminary injunction ‘must be narrowly tailored to remedy only the specific harms shown by the plaintiffs, rather than to enjoin all possible breaches of the law.’” (quoting Price v. City of Stockton, 390 F.3d 1105, 1117 (9th Cir. 2004))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).