Eighth Circuit· 4/27/1995

Mohamed v. Kerr

Citations

53 F.3d 911
1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 9578
1995 WL 242225

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

discussing the Fox Valley & Vicinity Constr. Workers Pension Fund decision
“The question remains for us to decide ... whether the Kerr settlement ‘specifically divest[ed] the spouse’s rights as a beneficiary under the policy.’ ”
“The question remains for us to decide ... whether the Kerr settlement specifically divested the spouse’s rights as a beneficiary under the policy.”
“a property settlement agreement entered into pursuant to a dissolution may divest former spouses of beneficiary rights in each other’s [ERISA benefits], if the agreement makes it clear that the former spouses so intend.”
“a property settlement agreement entered into pursuant to a dissolution may divest former spouses of beneficiary rights in each other’s [ERISA benefits], if the agreement makes it clear that the former spouses so intend.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beam, Bowman, Hansen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Mohamed v. Kerr

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.