Mobilemedia Ideas LLC v. Apple Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law as to patent invalidity, where defendant presented unrebutted testimony at trial regarding invalidity and plaintiff's expert only offered conclusory statement that \I don't see evidence for that\
• stating that a “jury is permitted to make credibility determinations and believe the witness it considers more trustworthy”
• reversing the denial of judgment as a matter of law where plaintiff’s expert offered “only testimony unre- lated to the actual limitation” of the relevant claim
• rejecting attempt to expand “means for processing 5 and storing” to any processor and memory where the specification only links a processor and 6 memory located in a camera
• cit- ing Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kan. City, 383 U.S. 1, 17 (1966)
• cit- ing Gonzalez v. Sec’y of Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 678 F.3d 254, 257 (3d Cir. 2012)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).