Federal Circuit· 3/17/2015
Mobilemedia Ideas LLC v. Apple Inc.
Citations
- 780 F.3d 1159
- 114 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1001
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 4185
- 2015 WL 1187323
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law as to patent invalidity, where defendant presented unrebutted testimony at trial regarding invalidity and plaintiff's expert only offered conclusory statement that \I don't see evidence for that\
- stating that a “jury is permitted to make credibility determinations and believe the witness it considers more trustworthy”
- reversing the denial of judgment as a matter of law where plaintiff’s expert offered “only testimony unre- lated to the actual limitation” of the relevant claim
- rejecting attempt to expand “means for processing 5 and storing” to any processor and memory where the specification only links a processor and 6 memory located in a camera
- cit- ing Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kan. City, 383 U.S. 1, 17 (1966)
- cit- ing Gonzalez v. Sec’y of Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 678 F.3d 254, 257 (3d Cir. 2012)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Taranto, Bryson, Chen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Federal Circuit· 2016-10-07· cited 124×
- Bayer Healthcare LLC v. Baxalta Inc.Federal Circuit· 2021-03-01· cited 71×
- Avid Technology, Inc. v. Harmonic, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2016-01-29· cited 67×
- Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2016-12-12· cited 58×
- Enplas Display Device Corpora v. Seoul Semiconductor CompanyFederal Circuit· 2018-11-19· cited 49×
- Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP v. Samsung Electronics Co.Federal Circuit· 2017-04-17· cited 25×
- Trustees of Boston University v. Everlight Electronics Co.Federal Circuit· 2018-07-25· cited 24×
- Centrak, Inc. v. Sonitor Technologies, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2019-02-14· cited 23×
- Comcast Ip Holdings I LLC v. Sprint Communications CompanyFederal Circuit· 2017-03-07· cited 19×
- Shire LLC v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLCFederal Circuit· 2015-09-24· cited 17×
- Tviim, LLC v. McAfee, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2017-03-21· cited 10×
- Wi-Lan Inc. v. Sharp Electronics CorporationFederal Circuit· 2021-04-06· cited 10×
- In re Biogen 755 Patent Litig.D. New Jersey· 2018-09-07· cited 9×
- Cyntec Company, Ltd. v. Chilisin Electronics Corp.Federal Circuit· 2023-10-16· cited 9×
- Ipcom Gmbh & Co. v. Htc CorporationFederal Circuit· 2017-07-07· cited 8×
- Virginia Innovation Sciences Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 2017-01-05· cited 6×
- Chamberlain Grp., Inc. v. Techtronic Indus. Co.E.D. Illinois· 2018-05-23· cited 6×
- Ironworks Patents, LLC v. Apple, Inc.D. Delaware· 2017-06-12· cited 5×
- Imperium IP Holdings (Cayman), Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co.E.D. Texas· 2017-04-27· cited 4×
- MobileMedia Ideas, LLC v. Apple Inc.D. Delaware· 2016-07-21· cited 2×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court· 1966-02-21· cited 3,371×
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1996-07-25· cited 2,428×
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court· 2007-04-30· cited 1,310×
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court· 2015-01-20· cited 634×
- Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationFederal Circuit· 1998-09-09· cited 607×
- ACUMED LLC v. Advanced Surgical Services, Inc.Third Circuit· 2009-03-20· cited 337×
- John D. Starceski, at No. 94-3208 v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, at No. 94-3182Third Circuit· 1995-05-03· cited 304×
- B. Braun Medical, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories and Np Medical, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsFederal Circuit· 1997-09-08· cited 280×
- Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corporation, Visa International Service Association, Inc., Visa Usa, Inc. And Crestar Bank, Inc., Defendants-CrossFederal Circuit· 1999-08-27· cited 245×
- Gonzalez v. Secretary of Department of HomeLand SecurityThird Circuit· 2012-03-19· cited 187×
- North American Vaccine, Inc. And National Research Council of Canada v. American Cyanamid Company and Praxis Biologics, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1993-12-08· cited 142×
- Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2012-08-13· cited 119×
- Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. Maersk Contractors USA, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2010-08-18· cited 89×
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., and Guidant Corporation, Defendants-CrossFederal Circuit· 2001-04-20· cited 78×
- Robert Bosch, Llc v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.Federal Circuit· 2013-06-14· cited 71×
- Adams Respiratory Therapeutics, Inc. v. Perrigo Co.Federal Circuit· 2010-10-06· cited 67×
- Energy Transportation Group, Inc. v. William Demant Holding A/S, WDH Inc.Federal Circuit· 2012-10-12· cited 49×
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. v. Cordis Corp.Federal Circuit· 2009-01-15· cited 34×
- Pitts v. DelawareThird Circuit· 2011-06-17· cited 34×
- Krippelz v. Ford Motor Co.Federal Circuit· 2012-01-27· cited 33×
Other cases named Mobilemedia Ideas LLC v. Apple Inc.
8 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- MobileMedia Ideas, LLC v. Apple Inc.D. Delaware· 2012-11-08· cited 5×
- Mobilemedia Ideas, LLC v. Apple Inc.D. Delaware· 2013-09-05· cited 3×
- Mobilemedia Ideas, LLC v. Apple Inc.D. Delaware· 2013-09-05· cited 3×
- MobileMedia Ideas, LLC v. Apple Inc.D. Delaware· 2016-07-21· cited 2×
- Mobilemedia Ideas, LLC v. Apple Inc.D. Delaware· 2012-08-16· cited 2×
- MobileMedia Ideas LLC v. Apple Inc.D. Delaware· 2012-09-10· cited 2×
- Mobilemedia Ideas, LLC v. Apple Inc.D. Delaware· 2016-04-11· cited 1×
- Mobilemedia Ideas LLC v. Apple Inc.Supreme Court· 2015-10-05
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.