Krippelz v. Ford Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the Federal Circuit’s repeated caution “against overreliance on drawings that are neither expressly to scale nor linked to quantitative values in the specification.” see also Doc. No. 195-2, Gillest Tr., PagelD 10574- 75 (42:7-43:19
• prior art reference anticipated claim even though one embodiment in prior reference did not anticipate
• “This court has repeatedly cautioned against overreliance on drawings that are neither expressly to scale nor linked to quantita- tive values in the specification.”
• “A patentee’s state- ments during reexamination can be considered during Case: 20-1189 Document: 46 Page: 12 Filed: 02/10/2021 12 INFINITY COMPUTER PRODUCTS v. OKI DATA AMERICAS, INC. claim construction.”
• applying prosecution history disclaimer from reexamination proceedings
• applying prosecution history disclaimer from reexamina- tion proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).