· 7/7/1992
M.M.H. v. United States
Citations
- 966 F.2d 285
- 1992 WL 146744
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Feres doctrine did not apply to veteran’s negligence claim based on Army’s negligence after vet- eran’s discharge
- Army's post-discharge negligence actionable only if the negligent act constituted a new and independent tort after service-member was discharged from active duty
- Army’s post-discharge negligence actionable only if the negligent act constituted a new and independent tort after service-member was discharged from active duty
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffey, Ripple, Eschbach
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.