Seventh Circuit· 7/7/1992
M.M.H. v. United States
Citations
- 966 F.2d 285
- 1992 WL 146744
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Feres doctrine did not apply to veteran’s negligence claim based on Army’s negligence after vet- eran’s discharge
- Army's post-discharge negligence actionable only if the negligent act constituted a new and independent tort after service-member was discharged from active duty
- Army’s post-discharge negligence actionable only if the negligent act constituted a new and independent tort after service-member was discharged from active duty
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffey, Ripple, Eschbach
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Donald Vance v. Donald RumsfeldSeventh Circuit· 2012-11-07· cited 183×
- Chizmar v. MacKieAlaska Supreme Court· 1995-05-19· cited 96×
- Verinakis v. Medical Profiles, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1999-03-04· cited 75×
- Gregory Maas, Frank Felinski, Richard Sciaraffa, and Gregory Binnebose v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1996-08-23· cited 34×
- Carol Clendening v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 2021-11-30· cited 32×
- Jeannemarie Selbe v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1997-12-03· cited 20×
- Jones v. RallosAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-06-25· cited 19×
- Marrie v. NickelsD. Kansas· 1999-10-18· cited 18×
- Stephenson v. StoneSeventh Circuit· 1994-04-05· cited 13×
- Marriott v. Sedco Forex International Resources, Ltd.D. Massachusetts· 1993-07-22· cited 11×
- Jones v. RallosAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-10-12· cited 7×
- In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationS.D. New York· 2005-03-15· cited 5×
- Brown v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 2006-06-23· cited 3×
- Maas v. United StatesN.D. Illinois· 1995-08-23· cited 2×
- Bielema v. BiesterN.D. Illinois· 1995-03-15
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1950-12-04· cited 1,830×
- Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-13· cited 1,183×
- United States v. StanleySupreme Court· 1987-06-25· cited 644×
- United States v. ShearerSupreme Court· 1985-06-27· cited 602×
- United States v. BrownSupreme Court· 1954-12-06· cited 440×
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 351×
- Judith Nelson and Darci Anne Bowman, Cross-Appellees v. Monroe Regional Medical Center, Formerly Known as the Monroe Clinic, Cross-AppellantSeventh Circuit· 1991-04-10· cited 89×
- Thornwell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 1979-05-30· cited 65×
- Alice P. Broudy v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1981-11-09· cited 63×
- Jimmy Ray Rogers and Linda Rogers v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1990-05-25· cited 41×
- Schwartz v. United StatesE.D. Pennsylvania· 1964-06-17· cited 36×
- Everett v. United StatesS.D. Ohio· 1980-06-13· cited 32×
- Monroe Clinic v. NelsonSupreme Court· 1991-10-10· cited 29×
- Christy Cole, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert E. Cole, Deceased and Helen Cole v. United StatesEleventh Circuit· 1985-03-20· cited 26×
- Hawes v. Germantown Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1981-06-05· cited 18×
- Calvin G. Sweet v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1982-08-26· cited 14×
- Wisniewski v. United StatesE.D. Wisconsin· 1976-07-08· cited 10×
- Laswell v. BrownW.D. Missouri· 1981-05-12· cited 9×
- John Misany v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1989-04-24· cited 5×
- Sweet v. United StatesD. South Dakota· 1981-12-28· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.