Skip to main content
· 7/7/1992

M.M.H. v. United States

Citations

  • 966 F.2d 285
  • 1992 WL 146744

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Feres doctrine did not apply to veteran’s negligence claim based on Army’s negligence after vet- eran’s discharge
  • Army's post-discharge negligence actionable only if the negligent act constituted a new and independent tort after service-member was discharged from active duty
  • Army’s post-discharge negligence actionable only if the negligent act constituted a new and independent tort after service-member was discharged from active duty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Ripple, Eschbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.