Mjolsness v. Mjolsness

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The [district] court was able to observe the witnesses and had the opportunity to judge their credibility on a first-hand basis.”
• “The question of whether there is [an implied contract] usually is to be determined by the trier of facts as an inference of fact to be drawn.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Searles v. Searles
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-03-11· cited 12×
• Acton Construction Co. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-03-18· cited 11×
• Wilson v. Skogerboe
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-01-14· cited 9×
• Marriage of Nelson v. Quade
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-10-13· cited 8×
• Marriage of Choa Yang Xiong v. Su Xiong
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-06-06· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Estate of Eriksen
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-08-19· cited 55×
• City of Minnetonka v. Carlson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-10-31· cited 42×
• Roske v. Ilykanyics
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1951-01-12· cited 28×
• Wright v. Wright
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-10-30· cited 22×
• Hollom v. Carey
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-02-08· cited 20×
• Tamarac Inn, Inc. v. City of Long Lake
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-09-25· cited 17×
• Koberg v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-03-08· cited 5×