Skip to main content

Searles v. Searles

Citations

  • 420 N.W.2d 581
  • 1988 Minn. LEXIS 31
  • 1988 WL 19659

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The affirmative defenses of laches and estoppel alleged in defendant’s answer are not put in issue by defendant’s Rule 12 motion questioning only the sufficiency of plaintiff’s complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simonett, Popovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.