Supreme Court of Minnesota· 3/11/1988
Searles v. Searles
Citations
- 420 N.W.2d 581
- 1988 Minn. LEXIS 31
- 1988 WL 19659
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The affirmative defenses of laches and estoppel alleged in defendant’s answer are not put in issue by defendant’s Rule 12 motion questioning only the sufficiency of plaintiff’s complaint.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Simonett, Popovich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.