Mize v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence did not demonstrate witness’s intent to commit theft as matter of law but conflicting evidence on intent did raise fact issue for jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jarnigan v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-08-09· cited 42×
• Gonzalez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2001-11-29· cited 32×
• Juan Antonio Pena v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2005-06-30
• Francisco Javier Azuara, Jr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2015-02-02
• Francisco Javier Azuara, Jr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2015-02-06

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Almanza v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-02-27· cited 6,557×
• Saunders v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-09-25· cited 431×
• Kunkle v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-06-18· cited 227×
• Ex Parte Zepeda
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-12-04· cited 156×
• Creel v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-05-18· cited 88×
• Arney v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-05-16· cited 73×
• Caraway v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-05-18· cited 67×
• Mize v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1995-12-14· cited 13×