Skip to main content
· 5/20/1983

Mitford v. De Lasala

Citations

  • 666 P.2d 1000
  • 1983 Alas. LEXIS 447
  • 115 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 4254

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is well settled that proof of an express contract covering the services in question precludes relief in quantum meru-it.”
  • \[Glood faith and fair dealing in this case would prohibit firing [the employee] for the purpose of preventing him from [from obtaining compensation due under contract].\
  • implied convenant of good faith and fair dealing in private at-will employment contract
  • implied convenant of good faith and fair dealing in private at-will employment contract
  • ‘‘[t]he prevention doctrine is subsumed in [the] duty [of good faith and fair dealing]’’
  • employee discharged, depriving him of 10 percent profit sharing arrangement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burke, Rabinowitz, Matthews, Compton, Dimond, Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.