MiTek Holdings, Inc. v. Arce Engineering Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• encouraging parties to raise objectively reasonable claims and defenses in order to further the purposes of the Copyright Act
• addressing the Copyright Act’s attorney’s fees provision, 17 U.S.C. § 505
• “[T]he magistrate judge was correct in noting that MiTek's good faith in bringing its suit was not determinative of the issue of attorney’s fees.”
• “It is unsurprising that no case law supports the proposition that a difference in financial wealth, in and of itself, is sufficient to justify imposition of attorney’s fees under § 505.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).