Mitchell v. XO COMMUNICATIONS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding to JCC for findings of fact where order's lack of clarity prohibited meaningful appellate review
• remanding because findings in order are so conflicting and inconsistent as to make meaningful appellate review impossible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Garcia v. Fence Masters, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-08-06· cited 4×
• Aguilar v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-23· cited 4×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mitchell v. XO COMMUNICATIONS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-15· cited 22×
• Tidwell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-08-12· cited 9×
• Allen v. Protel, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-21· cited 8×