Skip to main content
· 3/10/2009

Mitchell v. XO COMMUNICATIONS

Citations

  • 3 So. 3d 1278
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2147
  • 2009 WL 593074

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding to JCC for findings of fact where order's lack of clarity prohibited meaningful appellate review
  • remanding because findings in order are so conflicting and inconsistent as to make meaningful appellate review impossible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Van Nortwick Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.