District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 4/11/2013
Mitchell v. United States
Citations
- 64 A.3d 154
- 2013 WL 1460502
- 2013 D.C. App. LEXIS 148
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acknowledging that, although the “significance of the title of the statute should not be exaggerated” and cannot 5 Relatedly, Section 28-3903(c)(2
- title of provision \cannot limit the plain meaning of the text\
- appellant waives claims not raised in their briefing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwelb, Thompson, Washington
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Nero v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-08-15· cited 30×
- JOHN DOE NO. 1 v. SUSAN L. BURKEDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-03-10· cited 13×
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-06-06· cited 13×
- Howard Univ. Hosp. v. Dist. of Columbia Dep't of Emp't Servs.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2019-01-31· cited 6×
- Lewis v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-10-03· cited 6×
- BERNARD FREUNDEL v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-09-15· cited 5×
- DION M. SLATER-EL v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-07-07· cited 4×
- In re: J.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-10-09
- Miller v. D.C. OEADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2020-09-10
- Lee v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-08-26
- Mills v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-09-30
- Watson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-01-27
- Lucas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2023-12-07
- Client Earth v. Washington Gas Light CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2025-09-04
- Jennings & Turner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2026-02-26
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court· 1998-06-15· cited 1,374×
- Carter v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-06-12· cited 463×
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mandel Bros.Supreme Court· 1959-05-04· cited 317×
- Rivas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-08-23· cited 215×
- State v. PaduaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-03-29· cited 162×
- Mills v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-08-21· cited 79×
- MacK v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-02-23· cited 56×
- Alfaro v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-09-30· cited 47×
- In Re ShearinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-12-28· cited 34×
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-11-15· cited 26×
- Lee v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-09-04· cited 22×
- Ransom v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-06-24· cited 17×
- In re R.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-02-22· cited 14×
- Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-01-28· cited 11×
- Coffin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-03-01· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.