District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 7/22/1993
Mitchell v. United States
Citations
- 629 A.2d 10
- 1993 D.C. App. LEXIS 174
- 1993 WL 274489
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]n light of our affirmance of appellant’s conviction for first-degree murder, the felony murder conviction must be vacated, and we remand to the trial court to impose sentence for the burglary charge which survives without merger.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwelb, Sullivan, Pryor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kitt v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-08-03· cited 39×
- Frye v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-10-14· cited 37×
- Bell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-05-16· cited 33×
- Nicholas v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2012-06-06· cited 33×
- State v. LassiterSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-01-12· cited 27×
- McCloud v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-09-27· cited 16×
- Garibay v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-12-06· cited 15×
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-01-31· cited 15×
- Bacchus v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-04-30· cited 11×
- Parks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-04-06· cited 10×
- Wallace G. Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-12-12· cited 7×
- Mitchell v. HollidayDistrict of Columbia· 2016-07-29· cited 6×
- Jackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-04-20· cited 4×
- Mitchell v. SamuelsDistrict of Columbia· 2017-06-14· cited 3×
- Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-02-22
- Mitchell v. United States of AmericaDistrict of Columbia· 2018-05-10
- Mitchell v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia· 2018-09-27
- Mitchell v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia· 2019-09-17
- Mitchell v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia· 2021-04-30
- Hairston v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-12-09
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1964-02-13· cited 860×
- Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-10-15· cited 92×
- Commonwealth v. FaisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-03-25· cited 85×
- Clark v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-06-21· cited 74×
- Campbell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-08-16· cited 71×
- United States v. Dewey BobbittD.C. Circuit· 1971-11-18· cited 66×
- Settles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-03-11· cited 66×
- Ali v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-01-26· cited 59×
- Rink v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-06-21· cited 48×
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-05-04· cited 32×
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-10-25· cited 30×
- Garris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-08-04· cited 27×
- Hill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-05-30· cited 27×
- Green v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-10-11· cited 26×
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-10-31· cited 26×
- Gezmu v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1977-07-01· cited 26×
- Romero v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1969-11-03· cited 20×
- Commonwealth v. PacellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-13· cited 16×
- Wright v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-08-05· cited 14×
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-01-16· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.