Mitchell v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]here is nothing in the law that requires [a spouse] to maintain insurance unless special circumstances dictate its advisability.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Layeni v. Layeni
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-28· cited 22×
• McDaniel v. McDaniel
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-13· cited 19×
• Frechter v. Frechter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-01· cited 12×
• Jarrell v. Jarrell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-05· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Eagan v. Eagan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-01-21· cited 32×
• Singer v. Singer
  First Circuit· 1977-02-25· cited 27×
• Rubino v. Rubino
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-06-29· cited 24×
• Farrington v. Farrington
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-11-25· cited 21×
• Waskin v. Waskin
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-06-07· cited 16×
• Wood v. Friedman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-10-15· cited 7×