Supreme Court· 6/29/1981
Mitchell v. Forsyth
Citations
- 453 U.S. 913
- 69 L. Ed. 2d 997
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding notice adequate even when final rule setting standard for allowable exposure of airborne lead in workplace was twice as stringent as proposed rule
- 15% level of minority and women employment with regards to city’s.major construction contracts
- statute designed to deter or prevent government from improperly invading individual privacy
- “the decision of the Attorney General, or a prosecuting attorney, to initiate a prosecution is not made in a vacuum ... [t]he right to make the decision ... must include some limited right to gather necessary information”
- If Attorney General's authorization of warrantless wiretap was made in attempt to secure information to determine whether to initiate a criminal prosecution, then he was entitled to absolute immunity. Case remanded to district court for development of the record
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Consideration, Took
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
206 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterSixth Circuit· 1999-03-08· cited 2,642×
- Greg Myers, Etc. v. R. Kathleen Morris, Scott County Attorney, Etc.Eighth Circuit· 1987-04-09· cited 525×
- Hobson v. WilsonD.C. Circuit· 1984-06-08· cited 501×
- Kulwicki v. DawsonThird Circuit· 1992-07-02· cited 452×
- Richard L. Windsor v. The TennesseanSixth Circuit· 1984-01-23· cited 368×
- Josiah Haynesworth and Fred Hancock v. Frank P. Miller, Chief, Law Enforcement Section, Office of the Corporation Counsel, (Two Cases)D.C. Circuit· 1987-05-29· cited 367×
- Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd.Third Circuit· 1983-05-17· cited 365×
- Schrob v. CattersonThird Circuit· 1991-11-15· cited 356×
- Harold Katz and Ruth Katz v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyThird Circuit· 1992-08-06· cited 303×
- United States v. Juan Manuel Bautista, United States of America v. Javier Cabrera-MartinezNinth Circuit· 1982-08-24· cited 274×
- United States v. ManbeckFourth Circuit· 1984-09-11· cited 267×
- L. Patrick Gray, III v. Griffin BellD.C. Circuit· 1983-06-21· cited 241×
- Washington v. LambertNinth Circuit· 1996-10-28· cited 225×
- Randolph-Sheppard Vendors of America v. Caspar W. Weinberger, National Council of State Agencies for the Blind v. Caspar W. WeinbergerD.C. Circuit· 1986-07-30· cited 213×
- Acierno v. CloutierThird Circuit· 1994-10-18· cited 160×
- Alan McSurely v. John L. McClellan Thomas Ratliff, Individually and as Sometime Commonwealth Attorney for Pike County, KentuckyD.C. Circuit· 1982-12-10· cited 153×
- Venen v. SweetThird Circuit· 1985-03-29· cited 140×
- Morton H. Halperin v. Henry A. KissingerD.C. Circuit· 1986-12-05· cited 119×
- Collins on Behalf of Collins v. TabetNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-02-04· cited 118×
- United States v. Abraham Ceballos and Efrain AdamesSecond Circuit· 1987-02-13· cited 111×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.