Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 6/29/1981

Mitchell v. Forsyth

Citations

  • 453 U.S. 913
  • 69 L. Ed. 2d 997

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding notice adequate even when final rule setting standard for allowable exposure of airborne lead in workplace was twice as stringent as proposed rule
  • 15% level of minority and women employment with regards to city’s.major construction contracts
  • statute designed to deter or prevent government from improperly invading individual privacy
  • “the decision of the Attorney General, or a prosecuting attorney, to initiate a prosecution is not made in a vacuum ... [t]he right to make the decision ... must include some limited right to gather necessary information”
  • If Attorney General's authorization of warrantless wiretap was made in attempt to secure information to determine whether to initiate a criminal prosecution, then he was entitled to absolute immunity. Case remanded to district court for development of the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Consideration, Took

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

206 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.