Tenth Circuit· 5/29/1981
Mistretta v. Sandia Corp.
Citations
- 649 F.2d 1383
- 26 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 219
- 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12808
- 26 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 31,864
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- insufficient proof of nondiscriminatory reasons for layoffs of four employees; evidence of inherent bias in employer’s ranking system.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barrett, Doyle, Seth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 15,585×
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 9,383×
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court· 1969-05-19· cited 2,097×
- Thor C. LAUGESEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ANACONDA COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1975-01-10· cited 293×
- James B. McCORSTIN, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1980-07-16· cited 126×
- Henry D. THORNTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maj. Gen. John COFFEY, Jr., Defendant-AppellantTenth Circuit· 1980-03-28· cited 38×
- Walter Everett RAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAFEWAY STORES, INC., Defendant-AppelleeTenth Circuit· 1980-02-07· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.