Miranda v. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that court abuses its discretion when the complaint is dismissed for untimely service after the statute of limita tions has expired
• “We conclude in the case before us that the circuit court erred in dismissing [the plaintiffl’s complaint with prejudice. First, dismissal with prejudice was not one of the options available to the court under rule 1.070(j
• “[W]hen the statute of limitations has run and service has been perfected as of the date of the hearing on the motion to dismiss, a trial court abuses its discretion by not extending the time for service and dismissing the complaint.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Scullock v. Gee
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-03-12· cited 4×
• Fernandez v. Cohn
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-02-09· cited 3×
• Carter v. Mendez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-06-11· cited 2×
• Henderson v. Johnson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-09-13
• Surf Consultants, Inc. v. Lizbeth Sanchez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-07-30

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wallace v. Kato
  Supreme Court· 2007-02-21· cited 4,908×
• Totura & Co., Inc. v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-02-17· cited 33×
• Chaffin v. Jacobson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-17· cited 24×
• Amendment to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(J)—Time Limit for Service
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-03-04· cited 14×
• Skrbic v. QCRC Associates Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-15· cited 13×
• Amendment to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.070(J)—Time Limit for Service
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-09-24· cited 12×
• Brown v. Ameri Star, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-15· cited 9×
• Kohler v. Vega-Maltes
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-12· cited 6×