Carter v. Mendez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The trial court erred in dismissing Carter’s complaint without giving him notice or the opportunity to be heard. Rule 1.070(j) states that a trial court may act on its own initiative; however, the court may only act ‘on its under rule 1.420(a)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• OLGA AGURCIA VASQUEZ v. EMILIO MARTIN NADRA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-12-22
• Ocean Capital Funding, LLC, Etc. v. Obsidian Financial Services, Inc., Etc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-12-10

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Todd v. Johnson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-14· cited 9×
• Miranda v. Young
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-10-09· cited 8×
• Connelly v. CROWN CRUISE LINE, INC.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-18· cited 6×
• Lenoir v. Jones
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-14· cited 3×
• Sumner v. GROS, MD
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-05· cited 2×
• Federal Home Loan Mortgage, Corp. v. Lascio
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-10· cited 1×