Minzer v. Keegan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where allegedly material omissions in the proxy statement would not have induced any reasonable investor to be less likely to approve the objected-to merger, there was no causal link between the omission and any harm resulting from approval of the merger

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Resnik v. Swartz
  Second Circuit· 2002-09-06· cited 54×
• Minzer v. Keegan
  Second Circuit· 2000-07-10· cited 17×
• McKesson Corp. v. Green
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-07-14· cited 10×
• Seinfeld v. Bartz
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-03-07· cited 6×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 2,447×
• Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.
  Supreme Court· 1970-01-26· cited 1,683×
• J. I. Case Co. v. Borak
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-08· cited 1,399×
• Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. Green
  Supreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,218×
• Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. Sandberg
  Supreme Court· 1991-06-27· cited 584×
• Koppel v. 4987 Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1999-02-05· cited 167×
• Paramount Communications, Inc. v. Time Inc.
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1990-03-09· cited 105×